The landscape of alternative projects, or alt-projects, is a dynamic and ever-evolving space where people with diverse motivations and backgrounds converge to pursue shared goals. Over the course of more than a 20 years of direct involvement in meany alt-groups, I’ve observed recurring patterns and dynamics that shape the trajectory of these projects. In this post from 2007, I aim to provide insight into these dynamics and offer a framework for understanding the roles of different participants at various stages of an alt-project’s development.
Firstly, it’s useful to define the key terms used to think about (categorize) participants in alt-projects:
1. Getting Things Done People: These individuals are driven by a desire to see tangible results and are focused on action rather than process. While they are instrumental in initiating projects, they may eventually transition to other roles as projects progress.
2. Working People: Often overlooked, these individuals form the backbone of any alt-project, contributing tirelessly to its execution and maintenance. Despite their significant contributions, they may receive minimal recognition for their efforts.
3. Bureaucrats: In a positive sense, bureaucrats are individuals skilled in creating and navigating structures within alt-projects. They play a crucial role in sustaining the project, but may inadvertently perpetuate dysfunction when influenced by other groups.
4. Theorists: These individuals bring a theoretical perspective to alt-projects, often challenging/pushing conventional wisdom and advocating for alternative approaches. However, they may struggle to find their voice within consensus decision-making processes, leading to marginalization.
5. Life Stylists: Emerging from the periphery of alt-projects, life stylists are drawn to successful initiatives but lack a clear commitment to sustained involvement. While some may integrate into other roles, others contribute to a burgeoning lifestyle aspect within the project.
The evolution of an alt-project unfolds across several stages:
1. Initiation: Driven by “getting things done” people, projects begin with a burst of energy and enthusiasm.
2. Expansion: As projects grow, a mix of working people and bureaucrats join the effort, providing stability and structure.
3. Specialization: With the project’s scope widening, “getting things done” people branch out into parallel initiatives, placing greater responsibility on working people and bureaucrats.
4. Consolidation: Burnout among initial instigators leads to a shift in focus towards sustaining the project, with bureaucrats and working people assuming central roles.
5. Peak and Decline: At its zenith, the project faces the dual challenges of maintaining momentum while grappling with internal dynamics. Lifestyle groups emerge, exerting influence and potentially alienating new participants.
6. Reactivation Attempts: Recognizing signs of decay, a coalition of remaining “getting things done” people and long-standing bureaucrats seeks to revitalize the project. However, debates among theorists and lifestyle groups often stall progress.
7. Renewal Efforts: Gathering to address project stagnation, participants confront the challenges of consensus decision-making. Despite goodwill, the exclusion of key voices perpetuates underlying issues.
This cyclical process underscores the inherent complexities of alt-projects and the importance of practical action in sustaining engagement. As burnout and disillusionment set in, parallel initiatives may emerge, drawing in fresh energy and redirecting the focus of participants. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics empowers people to make informed decisions about their involvement in alt-projects, contributing to a more sustainable and inclusive activist landscape.