If we close everything we are left with the evil, a bad outcome

What do you think *should* be closed? Or at least is OK to be closed?

Let’s start from a traditional liberal view: The majority of social interactions should be done in the OPEN and some private interactions should be done CLOSED.

We can discuss from this.

What the current dogma misses is that just about all good social power comes from OPEN

And meany social evils come from CLOSED

If we close/lock everything down, we are left with the evil, a bad outcome.

There are world-view gaps that make this a hard bridge to hold in place.

Example Diaspora and RSS based networks – the young Turks did a CLOSED network and shouted down the existing OPEN networks… 10 years go by, and we have to reinvent RSS+ as #ActivityPub to launch open networks a new – lets talk more about examples like this when we talk about the #geekproblem and #encryptionists. The 10 years that is missing is the problem.

It’s mostly a view of human nature, thus sociology and politics, applied to social groups who make and use #openweb technology. So if you are new to thinking about this maybe start with some basic wikipedia though the quality has become well muddy over the last 5 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies

The #geekproblem has assumptions, so we need to start to think about this, a good start:

Conservatism

Liberalism

Anarchism

Then ask questions with ideology in mind as motivations and course for the #openweb