The real blockages in activist tech

It’s not just the tech, we’ve had working #FOSS tools, protocols, and infrastructure for decades. What kills movements is social, it’s the politics. Fractionalism – ideological vanguards fighting to capture and control. Authoritarian “protection” – censorship framed as security, silencing criticism. Shrinking ghettos – small groups defining themselves by exclusion, not expansion.

On the so-called radical paths, whether Trotskyist, Stalinist, or anarchist, the pattern is the same: authority asserts itself, dialogue is shut down, energy drains away. This is not new, it’s what happened in #Indymedia’s first wave (2000–2015). A boom of 100+ servers worldwide collapsed under internal antagonisms and the pressure of repression. The pattern is likely to repeat today in the #Fediverse – a federation of “benevolent dictatorships,” ideological ghettos, and isolation bubbles.

On this path, it’s still the same two poisons. Greed – the monetizers, who see everything as an opportunity to exploit. Liberals – who smother movements with control, respectability politics, and blocking, until the right crushes them anyway. Then we have the social issue of the #geekpronlem in front of this.

So why do alt tech at all, with projects like #Indymediaback / #OMN? Simple, It’s because this time is an attempt to break this cycle. It’s not about building “the next Twitter,” or even just “the next Indymedia.” It’s about building infrastructure that makes it harder for greed and liberalism to strangle movements.

That means, collective relations over exchange relations. If everything is transactional, the hydra of exploitation regrows from within. Messy consensus over vanguardism. Power must remain distributed, rooted in trust, not captured by “protectors”. Openness over gatekeeping, #4opens (open source, open data, open standards, open process) are non-negotiable. The aim is not a perfect system, but a resilient culture that resists authoritarian drift.

What we need now is a space for open discussion – not geek-only, not ghettoized, but broad, accessible, and transparent. Seed funding – servers and crew are running on fumes. Without subsistence support, even the strongest politics collapse under burnout. Affinity groups – real-world working crews who share trust and values, not just abstract online networks. Bridging – from #Fediverse to #P2P and other channels, so we can resist repression and surveillance without isolation.

We are in naked class war, the right is crushing the liberals, which ironically creates more space for the radical left. Liberals can’t block as effectively when their own protections are stripped away. This is the opening to build balanced radical progressive infrastructure – not just protest spaces, but growing, federating, living networks of communication and trust.

In short: #Indymediaback using the #OMN framework isn’t just about servers or software. It’s about breaking the repeating cycle of fractionalism, authoritarian drift, and liberal smothering, and creating conditions where grassroots media can actually survive long enough to matter.


Discover more from Hamish Campbell

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One thought on “The real blockages in activist tech

  1. But specifically capitalism as portrayed by those ideological vanguards as you say is either a different thing than it was defined in late 19th century or has evolved to a different form.

    And yes, among anti-capitalists those that have constructed the ivory towers of anti-capitalism will not admit defeat and theoretical vacuum in explaining what we see today.

    Most likely as capital of dominant industrial nations during late 19th and early 20th centuries came under attack by the labor movement they reorganized, or organized above and beyond the state to maintain domination and power. Global banking as it evolved post-Breton-Woods has served as a federation of industrial capitalists of the west and is the controlling actor behind the chaos that has been created. Economically, socially, environmentally, and politically, they rule through chaos and crises. They profit from chaos, war, misery, eco-destruction, food-scarcity.

    @info

Leave a Reply