In right wing and left wing, political extremism can easily function like religious fervour, creating clusters of bad ideas and behavers that are ingrained and resistant to change and challenge. This is cognitive dissonance, where people hold contradictory beliefs and behaviours without perceiving the inconsistency. We need to explore how dogmatic belief mirror religious convictions, the role of cognitive dissonance, and the mechanisms that allow people to maintain such conflicting views.
“How do these cretins live with their cognitive dissonance? ‘We won the war’/’I’m doing Nazi salutes’; ‘Respect the police’/’attack the police’; ‘Respect working people’/’trash this working neighbourhood’; ‘I demand the MSM tells the truth’/’I’ll believe anything from an unverified source’; ‘No unelected people in positions of power’/’Respect the royals’. In the US: ‘Heed the word of Jesus’/’Vote for a felonious sexual predator who vows to contradict all that Jesus said'” https://kolektiva.social/deck/@Richard_Littler@mastodon.social
Political beliefs can and do become religious dogmas for people, they become central to an individual’s identity. These beliefs are resistant to change because they provide a sense of belonging and certainty in a complex and uncertain world. Once embedded, belief systems create a filter and feedback loop through which all information is interpreted, leading to a confirmation bias where only supporting evidence is acknowledged, and contrary evidence is dismissed.
Cognitive dissonance occurs when peoples experience conflict between beliefs and behaviours, leading to psychological discomfort. To manage this discomfort, people employ coping mechanisms, such as rationalization, denial, or selective attention. This allows people to maintain contradictory positions without recognizing the inconsistency.
Let’s look at the quote above, the paradoxes highlighted: “Respect the police/attack the police” or “Heed the word of Jesus/vote for a felonious sexual predator”—illustrate how people in our current right-wing mess navigate conflicting ideas. These contradictions are resolved through rationalization and creating narratives to justify the inconsistency. For instance, violent actions against the police are framed as necessary resistance against a corrupt system, while supporting a morally evil leader is seen as a strategic choice for a greater good. From a psychological view:
- Confirmation Bias: people seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs and ignore or dismiss information that contradicts them. This bias reinforces their world-view and minimizes cognitive dissonance.
- Identity Protection: Dogmatic political beliefs become intertwined with personal identity. Challenging beliefs feels like a personal attack, leading people to defend their positions vehemently in the face of contradictory evidence.
- Echo Chambers: Social media and partisan news outlets create echo chambers, where people and communities are exposed predominantly to information that reinforces their beliefs. This isolation from diverse perspectives strengthens their commitment to their ideological positions.
- Moral Licensing: Some people use their adherence to certain moral principles to justify behaviours that contradict other principles. For example, they rationalize supporting a morally flawed leader by emphasizing his perceived effectiveness in achieving their broader goals.
The intractability of dogmatic beliefs and the accompanying cognitive dissonance make it exceptionally challenging to shift this problem. Attempts to introduce logical or evidence-based counterarguments backfire, reinforcing the original beliefs through a phenomenon known as the “backfire effect.” This occurs because the cognitive dissonance created by the counterargument leads people to cling more tightly to their initial beliefs as a defence mechanism.
Dogmatic political beliefs are fervent religious convictions, digging deep paths that are difficult to move away from. Cognitive dissonance allows people to stay on these paths by maintain contradictory beliefs and behaviours and by employing mechanisms such as confirmation bias, identity protection, echo chambers, and moral licensing. Understanding these #KISS psychological paths helps to address the challenges and changes needed for progressive movement to fostering alternative #4opens paths of constructive dialogue in society. Recognizing the deep-seated nature of these beliefs can help to develop engagement and thus the needed change to challenge this mess.
This is a tuff mess to compost, and is the root of our growing political and social violence.
You can maybe help https://opencollective.com/open-media-network