Embracing “messiness” as a feature, not a bug, in creating humane and effective tech solutions.
Why messiness matters, real-world social paths are inherently messy. Attempting to design tech solutions that are rigid, “perfect” systems leads to failure because they cannot adapt to human complexity and unpredictability. Projects that actually work in messy environments prioritize flexibility, openness, and adaptability over strict control and rigid frameworks.
Wikipedia is a messy, decentralized project that thrives because it prioritizes community and collaboration over technical perfection. The #Fediverse, with its federated nature, allows for diverse approaches and experimentation, embracing a level of messiness to resist centralization and foster creativity.
Code is a tool, not the goal, the value of software lies in its social impact—how people use it—not in the technical complexity or “cleverness” of the code itself. Over emphasizing code at the expense of social “use” creates #techchurn and decay. Projects without meaningful use end up abandoned, despite the sometimes impressive technical work. The practical path we argue for, is to prioritize designing for social utility, not only technical performance.
The #geekproblem we need to mediate is the churn of #techshit, of developers focusing too heavily on technical aspects, ignoring the social context and long-term utility of their work. This results in churn—continuous cycles of development with little lasting value—adding to the pile of decaying, unused code.
What are #KISS paths to avoid this, a simple first step is involving non-technical voices early in the process to ensure social relevance and usability. Use iterative development methods that prioritize real-world feedback over technical perfection. Embracing the #4opens: Open Data, Open Source, Open “industrial” standards, Open Process. Build for use, not show, with simplicity and usability over technical complexity. Engage people in testing and iterating early and often. Embrace the mess, imperfections and unpredictability are part of the process.
Strategies to build messy, human-centric projects: Start with the “Why”, clearly define the social purpose of the project before writing any code. What problem are you solving? Who benefits, and how?
@info @Research_FTW
🎉 We agree & hope others will too!
Our program has produced dozens of free small prosocial video games for teens since 2008. Teens need this info but might not learn it at home or school. Our charity is focused on violence prevention.
We wish our work were perfect . . . but ❤️ that it is useful.
Our quick-to-market approach is not elegant but it is flexible, fast, and delivers subject matter expertise about timely topics:
▪️ #consent
▪️ #resilience
▪️ #healthy #relationships
▪️ #criticalthinking
▪️ #media #literacy
▪️ #connectedness
🧐 If we waited for "perfect" we would still be waiting to publish that first game.
Over 1/2 million folks helped so far (and counting).
@stopTDV @gamingagainstv @consentgame @resiliencegames @connected @CriticalThinkingGames @gamingagainstv @playhoneymoon @edutooters @publichealth
@communicationscholars #education #videogames #nonprofit #prevention #publichealth #trauma #tech