To build consensus processes in #FOSS (Free and Open Source Software), we need to apply traditions from radical activism, messy democracy and affinity group organizing:
- Messy Democracy: Encourage open discussions, differing perspectives. Keep open space for debates, ensuring that small, actionable steps are agreed upon, even if the path is not linear or clear.
- Affinity Groups: Small, self-organized teams focus on tasks and goals. These groups can collaborate but retain autonomy, allowing for flexibility and diverse approaches to problem-solving.
- Focus: Start with a simple, shared purpose. Use tools like #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) to keep away from over-complicating processes. Consensus should be loose but structured, avoid rigid hierarchies.
For example, in FOSS, we could implement a process where a proposal only moves forward if it gains a basic level of support (likes or votes), and participants have the ability to block with a justification, allowing for transparent push back to create space for refinement.
By growing open processes (as in #4opens), trust is built, and solutions remain accessible and adaptable, promoting collective decision-making while keeping things practical.
As an example of this path. To tackle the paralysis and distrust embedded in open communities after 40 years of neoliberal (#deathcult) worship, I propose a simple consensus-building process on SocialHub using the tools already available.
Proposal:
- Add a prominent, reciprocal link between SocialHub and the #SWF.
- Use a #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) process to ensure grassroots decisions reflect community values and paths.
Process:
- Start a discussion on SocialHub based on a simple proposal.
- Secure 10 likes for consensus; a block requires 5 likes on an explanation.
- Review the decision in 3 months.
This approach emphasizes participation, native tools, and trust. It balances collective decision-making while avoiding bureaucratic paths that have failed in the past, such as #Indymedia’s formalized processes. By focusing on ruff, simple consensus, we can compost the polarizing mess, rebuild trust, and grow communities that act effectively.
Let’s avoid repeating history and start a practical path to herding cats for a decentralized, balanced approach! What do you think? Any ideas on how to improve the process?
UPDATE this social #KISS was ignored, then I was blocked on the site, more mess to compost.
