A river that needs crossing political and tech blogs - On the political side, there is arrogance and ignorance, on the geek side there is naivety and over- complexity

My videos are on these two youtube channels visionontv 3,832,876 views and undercurrents 22,689,976 views

 

Loading...

Enter your email address:

Entries with tag thinkingoutloud .

Were are we

Its important to understand the perspective/world view am coming from to understand what am saying about the state of the alternative. Anarchist/socialist/libertarian/liberal leaning on the start and tapering off the end... am reacting against Hierarchical/conservative/authoritarian. This is a classic enlightenment divide so we should all be well aware of living it – even though few actively think about this lived experience. The views in this series of posts need to be read with this in mind.

The options for an alternative to our current world view/experience/mindset is narrow and limited, largely it is a collection of failed traditions, unexamined and repeated by each amnesiac generation. The normal world, I will call it the “traditional” world for that is what it actually is is so dominant and global that any alternative is but shadows, the “occupy moment” is a obvious example. How did we come to this?

A very broad outline is needed before we go on, the 19th century was Capitalism, the 20th Liberalism, and the 21st century is Anarchy. Each ideology is a short form for the strongest thread running thought the dynamic parts of the global economy/culture. That is 19th was industrial production, then social democracy/welfareism and now digital libertarianism’s of the internet.

In the 1980's Thatcher and Reagan were the avant-gardist of demolishing idealogical alternatives, they were part of a movement that spread all around the world entrenching a right-wing ideology “the is no alternative” and “the end of history” this has been ingested and become part of all our structures/buroceseys/instations and a core part of everyone who grew up over this time and the generation after. This right project pushed the end of the 21st century back into the beginning of the 19th century at the same time that the “digitisation project” was sweeping in the 21st century of Anerkey. We now live in a hybrid time of 19th century ideology, crumbling 20th century social institutions and the future of the economy running on shackey 21st century arackic just in time/horizontal working of the dotcoms.

Thus at the start of the 21st century much is broken and little working today has “value”. Together with the last 2 century’s environmental legacy of climate change puts us as humanity in a shaky position. The ingested legacy of Ragen and Thatcher puts us as individuals in a shaky state to shape a path for humane survival.

A quick side note, this actually is not an environmental issue at all as in the planetary environment will look after it self as it has for millennium, speshers extinction on a large scale is the norm not an exception in planetary terms. The problem we face is a human one, saving the environment is a side issue, in a few thousand years with out us the environment will stabilise and diversify agen to replace the catastrophe that we are building with our destructive muddled thinking. The issue is can we save the things we value, the shifting environment being the thing we build this value wiithin.

Ok am going to leave this here half finished... and carry on in a scatty but overarching repetitive way in further posts :)

To look at what works in the alt and what doen't work - and the are some bit that do work to cheer you up :)

NUJ Delegate Meeting 2012 - Newcastle

(DRAFT)

The union's Delegate Meeting (DM 2012) will take place from Friday 5 until Sunday 7 October 2012 in Newcastle.

This is a reaction to the  final agenda  PDF

Thinking about the NUJ delegate meeting. We all agree we need a union, but it isn’t obvious what is its role, used to be about negotiating with the bosses, but now we are all our own bosses so a bit schizophrenic to be negotiating with our selves. Were are we now?

The digital age is in transition. Many in the new media are working for nothing, for nothing, where we should work for nothing for something. What is the something we should be working for? To repeat as the majority of people in the media (for a while) will be paid nothing would be good if they were working for something to help them be paid something in future.  

 

Over all I feel this DM is full of graysky solutions to the need for blue sky thinking – but better something now than pie in the sky maybe (;

 

1) performance related pay

* (graysky thinking) this is an attempt to keep “strong connections' between worker and employer, these are appropriate during the analogue age – were movement was limited and control was strong. In the digital age it is potently the opposite, movement liberated and control limited. We are replacing strong connections with weak connections. But this frees us up to be exploited as much as it frees us up to do what we wont... so think this is needed but shouldn’t be used as an attempt to get back into the trenches.

2) fair pensions

* (graysky thinking) are a way of forcing good action on people and rely on a strong state... do we have a strong state, will we have a strong state – if we don’t/won’t we should re-think this. What dose the world look like with out a strong state?

3) part timers redundancy

* good background action, increasing the cost of redundancy.

4) redress for young journalist in unpaid intern-ships

* trying to use the inertia of the 20th century to shape the 21st century is usefull but not forwarded thinking.

5) unpaid contributors

* 20th century from amateur to professional, 21st century from professional to amateur, general knowledge industry’s are increasingly becoming amateur agen. Forward thinking?

 

“A positive future for media sees a wholesale de-professionalism of media production and distribution, the numbers of full time paid media producers will fall by a factor of 100, that is for ever person paid to produce, distribute media in the turn of the century only 1 in 100 will be paid to do it in the positive view of the future of media. The logical transition of digitisation will being a shift from a small elite (paid) minority to a large amorphous (unpaid) majority.”

 

6) introduction of a levy system

* interesting (but old) idea, but can lead to new inefficient bureaucracy, has this worked in the 20th century? needs more research and blue sky thinking.

7) Copyright enforcement

* the spirit of this is “correct” the SOC amendment moves it into the irreverent, this is the big debate which will not happen.

8) moral rights

* fighting against bad contracts is a good thing to do. But the Q is what are “moral rights” in the age of re-mix?

10) privatisation of the assessment of the impact of government proposals

* in general I agree, but feel the current consensus of what needs to be done in the union would lead to the funding being miss-spent? Ideas?

11) opening up academic publishing, while protecting copy editors jobs/role.

* opening is essential, how to fund is a core question.

12) same as 11

13) freelance guide

* good plan, and outreach to wider “amateur content publishers”

14) platform neutral strategy

* working out new working relationships, should be seen for what it is, trying not to hold onto the old when it is blocking is a balance to this...

16) assault by media bosses on jobs and pensions

* fighting against change needs to be balanced with fighting for the better new.

17/18) pay freeze at newsquest

* fighting a rearguard action against profiteering is good but should not be used as an excuse not to ingade with building the new.

22) regional newspapers

* this is very muddled thinking, this is a question of the value of local brands and community traditions – and the lack of value the market places on them.

21) community interest companies

* more to co-operatives? This is a question of new business models?

24) assets of community value

* why not – what are the pro's and cons?

25) same as 24

26) Future of media in Scotland

* why not, IF the remit is wide anufe.

28) BBC

* The sacred cow of the BBC... and the question of a licence to view news?

30) commercialisation of BBC

* the culling of the sacred cow by 1000 cuts...

31) ITV and regional news

* the motion is a please be nice to use statement – the amendment has teeth.

33) Scotland and STV training

* what are they training them – if its 20th century this is a wasted opportunity.

34) replacing the government

* good rabble rousing stuff (:

36) pickles code

* this is full of contradictions... bureaucracy central media or decentralised citizen media? The union will support the bureaucracy but should we is a real question?

38) convention of human rights

* go for it, a diversity of strategy is a good thing.

40) black workers equality

* OK

41) defend the right to protest

* yep, give um the money?

43) regional pay

OK

44/45) democratise remuneration commits

YEP

46/48) healthcare?

????

49) paid lobbying

OK

20) digital transition (:

* very good and needed – BUT have a strong feeling the people who are pushing this might not be the people who would lead to a useful outcome – need to know more to always this worry.

72) bring diversity into the union

* its what its about – but who is pushing this?

50) internal politics?

* Need to know more

51) equality and women representation in the union

* YEP

53) to much paperwork?

* Need to know more?

55) photographers representation with in the union

interesting – but photograph as a proffeern is being pushed out of paid work and is likely to be pushed further... need to know for what resion this is being pushed? What outcome?

58/63) ageism

* internal politics? Need to know more

60) ageism

* sounds good, what is the outcome?

65) dead members rights

* interesting, needs clearer proposals

66) internal politics

* maybe, need to know more.

67/68) virtual meetings

* Think this should be rolled out rather than imposed, bring the virtual INTO the physical... see how this works and only then replace if appropriate.

69/88) internal politics

*

71) electing executive positions

* yep

73/74/77/78/79/80) increase union fees

* need to know more about the options

81) treat unemployed members better?

* need more information

82) using union company's to travel

* OK need back ground why this is an issue

83) get shares in media company’s to course trouble (:

* like the plan.

84/86/87) longer gap between DM (conference)

* physical meet-ups are good, this is the first one I have been to so will update this.

89) widen membership

* need to know how members feel about this (will update)

90/92) defining membership, kids care or age

* needs thought

95) refuges as members

* seams reasonable?

97) student members not studying journalism can be members

* OK

98) joint union membership

* OK

99) make joining the union easer

* online should be sought

103) training

* this one is vague, glad its put aside?

105) representatives training

* yes...

106/107) expanding the journalist magazine

* depends on what the space is for?

 109/110) leveson enquiry

 

more...

 

Showing 2 results.